ProCon.org’s Too Balanced Take on Vaccines
I was a little disappointed in Pro.Con.org’s article, “Should any vaccines be required for children?” I first discovered this site while job hunting and was impressed. Unfortunately, if you check out the pro and con list for this subject, you will see the same tired and debunked arguments against vaccines, including the utter myth that thimerosal is linked to autism.
If you go, put some comments on the pro side. I understand that this site wants to present a balanced argument, but is it balanced if one side is simply wrong about their facts?
