Morals for children in “Cars” and “Happy Feet”
Posted by: chansonSunday, November 16th, 2008
lead elder: Harmless? It is this kind of backsliding that has brought the scarcity upon us!
a foreign penguin: Excuse me smiley, could you speak plain penguin please?
Mumble: He thinks the food shortage has something to do with me.
lead elder: Do you not understand that we can only survive here when we are in harmony? And when you and your foreign friends lead us into your easy ways you offend the Great Guin — you invite Him to withhold His bounty!
an elder: He rules the seasons.
an elder: He giveth and He can taketh away.
Mumble: Wait a minute — happy feet can’t cause a famine.
an elder: If that kind of pagan display didn’t cause it, then what did?
Mumble: I think it comes from outside — from way beyond the ice. There are things out there we don’t understand.
foreign penguins: Mysteries! Mind-boggling mysteries! Mystic beings!
Mumble: Yeah, aliens. I’ve heard they’re smart.
an elder: He’s insane!
Mumble: No, they might be smarter than all of us — who knows?

an elder: He drove the fish away, and now he’s ranting this rubbish.
a foreign penguin: Let me tell something to you.
an elder: Don’t touch me, you filthy varmint! [smacks him]
Mumble: Watch it!
lead elder: So it follows: dissent leads to division and division leads us to doom! You Mumble “Happy Feet” must go.
Mom: Don’t you take one step, Sweetheart. You have as much right to be here as any of these daffy old fools.
all: [shocked gasps]
Dad: Norma Jean, I’ll deal with this.
Mumble: Pa?
Dad: Mumble, you must renounce your so-called friends, your peculiar thoughts, and your strange ways. If we are devout and sincere in our praise, the fish will return.
Mumble: But Pa…
Dad: Listen boy, I was a backslider myself. I was careless, and now we’re paying the price.
Mom: What’s this got to do with Mumble?
Dad: That’s why he is the way he is.
Mom: There’s nothing wrong with him!
Dad: Face it, Norma Jean! Our son’s all messed-up!
Mom: He is not messed-up, you hear me?
Dad: Believe me, I know he is!
Mom: How can you say that?
Dad: Because when he was just an egg, I dropped him.
all: [shocked gasps]
Mom: Mumble! Oh, my poor little Mumble!
Mumble: Ma, I’m perfectly fine.
Dad: No you’re not, boy. For all our sakes you must stop this freakiness with the feet.
lead elder: Your father speaks wisely. Heed his suffering heart and repent.
Mumble: But it just doesn’t make any sense!
lead elder: Then your arrogance leaves us no choice!
Dad: No, wait! [to Mumble] Son, you can do this. It ain’t so hard.
Mumble: Don’t ask me to change, Pa. Because I can’t.
Why was I surprised to see this scene in a big-budget animated feature for kids? The answer leads me to another favorite film at our house: Disney/Pixar’s Cars:
Cars and Happy Feet are both charming films with a lot to recommend them — not just in terms of stunning visuals (both are excellent on that count), but also in terms of storytelling. Regardless of what the Disney-phobes say, sometimes kids’ blockbusters aren’t too bad. And it matters for my sake as well as my kids’ sake since any film they love I end up having to watch a million times myself.
For the moment I’m not doing an overall movie review, though, I’d just like to talk about each film’s message. (For this topic I’m only covering films that are worth analyzing, which is why I’m skipping Thomas and the Magic Railroad, a film whose story and dialog are so formulaic that I swear the screenplay was written by a computerized script-generating program and whose moral is “if you need to cut corners on your medium-budget film, skimping on writers isn’t the place to do it…”)
Cars is very much a sports film, so its primary moral is standard sports film fare: learning that there are more important things than winning. The secondary moral deals with the charming little town of Radiator Springs and how it became run-down and forgotten.
Radiator Springs was a jewel strung along the necklace of Route 66: a lively and bustling town back when people used to travel a whole different way (”to have a great time, not to make great time”). It deteriorated to the point of being nearly deserted after it was bypassed by the interstate highway that cut through the land instead of following its contours.

The thing that impressed me most about the heart-string-tugging emotional center of the piece (the song Our Town), was the way they took a political issue (the deterioration of small-town America) and presented it in such a way that it would appeal to both liberals and conservatives. I don’t think anyone out there is seriously arguing that we should eliminate the interstate highway system. So presenting the interstate as the culprit is a safe choice: Republicans see the characters pining for the nineteen-fifties — back when everything was simple and innocent — and Democrats can read “the interstate” as a metaphor for “Wall-Mart.”
Naturally I saw Cars as another example of the law that no big-budget kids’ film can be made without passing the generic-moral no-parent-offended committee. That’s why I was so surprised by Happy Feet. Skeptical/secular parents: this film is for you.
Here’s the story in a nutshell:
Mumble is different from the other penguins from the moment he hatches from the egg. Emperor penguins are supposed to sing and not dance, yet Mumble is the opposite. There’s a shortage of fish and none of the penguins know why. The religious leaders make up an explanation and they’re wrong. Mumble doesn’t accept their explanation and instead is curious and starts piecing together bits of evidence to find that the fish shortage is caused by “aliens” (humans overfishing). His travels lead him to a preacher/guru penguin who has apparently had some contact with the “aliens” (evidenced by a man-made object attached to him), but he doesn’t want to help Mumble at first because he’s too wrapped up in the wealth and status he gets from pretending that he has the power to contact mystic beings. Eventually he comes around and sets off with Mumble and friends to find the aliens. The happy ending is that Mumble finds the aliens and makes contact with them through dance, persuading them of the importance of protecting the area around Antarctica from over-fishing.

On the surface this looks like a retelling of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer: the misfit is rejected until his unusual trait saves the day. But Happy Feet also has a strong theme of reason and evidence trumping the closed-minded shackles of religion. The one twist that may superficially look like a jab at skeptics is the fact that tales of “alien abduction” turn out to be true. The difference is that in our human universe the tales one hears of alien abductions don’t have evidence to back them up. This film correctly illustrates the fact that the skeptic will take an outlandish tale seriously as soon as the evidence warrants it.
The scene I quoted above is probably the most daring part of the film. The religious elders claim that God’s wrath for Mumble’s deviance is the cause of an unrelated disaster. Mumble’s father blames himself for Mumble’s deviance, and tries to persuade him to repent and try to be like everyone else. Even though Mumble (like all of the characters in the film) is clearly straight (and he has a rather generic straight love story in the film to back it up), I can’t avoid seeing Mumble’s situation as a transparent metaphor for being gay; illustrating how religion can inspire injustice.
(Actually, I wouldn’t be surprised at all if the writers of this film were gay men. There’s the mom and the love-interest who are framed entirely by their relation to Mumble, and aside from that it’s male-male buddies all the way…)
Mumble’s situation could also be taken as a metaphor for being an atheist since everyone knows that atheist is the new gay.
The point that stands out, however, is that — unlike practically every children’s story I’ve seen in my entire life — Happy Feet presents the conflict of reason versus faith and doesn’t give a single nod towards faith being the better choice.
The ending message of environmentalism and cross-cultural understanding is the icing on the cake of this bold film with courageously modern morals to guide our kids as they prepare to take the reins of our globally-interdependent world.
November 17th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
I noticed that too and it made me grin. There’s also a Secular modern moral in Pooh’s Grand Adventure. I wrote about it over on my new parenting blog at intj-mom.blogspot.com
November 19th, 2008 at 10:01 am
I can agree with you on the overall message in Happy Feet. I liked the movie, overall. I can’t stand the end, though. Mumble slowly going insane in captivity, followed by a serious Deus ex Machina really broke the mood of the movie for me. Were it not for that, we’d probably watch this movie all the time at my house.
November 19th, 2008 at 11:10 am
great post. im the father of an about to be 4yr old boy and Cars is defiantly in heavy rotation at our house. I have found that while disney is an evil multinational corporation, the pixar movies are pretty good and generally stand up to repeat viewing better than most. Im also glad you mentioned the other movie because have an issue i would love to get some good rational responses to. I dont think we own happy feet ( which i know is not pixar)but we have watched it all the way through at least three or four times between renting and HBO. while the musical medleys are like nails on a chalkboard to me, I too was excited to see the values put forward in the movie. The main character fighting for individualism and challenging a demagogue while highlighting humanities impact on the natural world are great things to see in a movie kids really enjoy. My issue is with a certain level of sexuality in the film. Ive never been accused of being a prude and i certainly believe in education and honesty over sheltering kids from sexuality but a little siren went off in my head a number of times during the movie. For one penguins dont have hips or tits so why do these? Now my wife points out that they dont dance talk sing or have religious demagogues either but still , a busty penguin. while the character design is a little thing some of the dancing just seemed a little more suggestive than i want to watch with my three year old. Again, i swear im not the preacher from foot loose but some of the freaking and grinding those penguins were doing was a little steamy. I understand that they used motion capture of real people to animate the movements and energy of dance which is a vibrant beautiful and often sexual thing but still, kids movie. There’s a dance number early on if i remember rite where the main character and the female lead while dancing stumble into a number of sex positions in quick succession. While it went rite over the head of my 3 year old and hit my wife and i as a cheeky goof i couldn’t help wonder about slightly older kids. Rude, cheeky humor and crass jokes are one thing, the fast talking robin williams character was honestly funny for Us and the kid and he was plenty salty. But dialogue gos over kids heads and if a kid is sophisticated enough understand what the hell hes talking about then fine. I dont know, what do you think am i being over sensitive to this ? Did anyone else’s parenting antenna go up when watching this movie or am i a wet paper bag?
November 19th, 2008 at 11:32 am
INTJ Mom — A secular moral in Pooh? I never would have guessed! Do you have a link to the specific post?
Ranson — That’s a good point.
ARWinNJ — I hadn’t noticed the overt sexuality, but I did have a problem with some sexism in the film, which may be related. I wrote a follow-up post discussing it here (see the comments for a lot of the detailed analysis).
November 19th, 2008 at 11:59 am
I can also agree on the Pooh comment. That’s a popular one with my kids, and there are some great messages. Just off the top of my head, it warns against using incomplete evidence to come to a conclusion, that fearing the unseen isn’t particularly warranted, and that one doesn’t have to rely on an outside source for strength of character.
November 19th, 2008 at 3:37 pm
My daughter and I both just cried from one end of Happy Feet to the other. Mumble’s plight really got to us both, but for different reasons. (To me because my best friend from high school is gay and had a really hard time in our small, closed down, and to her because at the time she was going through some rough stuff with her mainstream religious classmates.) Then the end, with Mumble slowly going mad in the zoo…. Suffice it to say we have not been back to the zoo since, only open-air animal parks.
But the message was unmistakable, and I loved it. She picked up on it, too, at the tender age of seven, and on the way home we talked about dogma and ingrained beliefs getting in the way of real reason. The word “religion” never came up — we are Unitarians, after all, and strive for tolerance as much as we can. But the point was plain to both of us. We don’t have Happy Feet at home because of that zoo scene, though. *shudder*
Cars…was another story entirely. We were all just bored by the whole thing. It was the first Pixar film that fell completely flat at our house.
November 22nd, 2008 at 7:21 am
I love my daughters immensely, but I am thoroughly glad when they get to watch a movie where the protagonist isn’t a comatose, silenced, or hidden away princess. Though a princess who used critical thought and was proactive, I could live with.
I’d agree on Happy Feet, but my wife insisted on taking our older daughter to it and leaving me at home with the younger at the time, so I have no idea how it affected her … maybe it is time to add it to the DVD collection. Thanks.